← Colin Owens

The same problems, twenty years apart

Twenty-eight years of work, seven recurring problems, and not one of them runs continuously.

Every thread in this career disappears for at least a decade and comes back. The shortest absence is eleven years. The longest is twenty-four: multi-tenancy, worked on in 1998 and then not again until 2023.

The second surprise is the clustering. Five of the seven threads return inside the same four-year window, after absences of eighteen to twenty-four years. The recent work is where the early work comes back, almost all at once.

The absences

ThreadAppearsLongest absence
multi-tenancy1998 · 202324 years
the wireframe1998 · 2000 · 202322
R&D labs2001 · 202421
argument as deliverable2003 · 202421
the specification2004 · 2005 · 2023 · 202618
accessibility2004 · 201915
data visualization2001 · 201411

How to read it

Black is declared. The bars are one person's account of where he worked and what the work was about. There is no external register to check them against, which is the opposite of the refinery piece, where every figure is federal data.
Red is derived. The absences are computed from those dates. Nobody asserted them, and they are the only claim here that follows from the data rather than from memory. If the declared part is wrong, the red is wrong with it.
Grey bars are teaching and school, which run alongside the work rather than instead of it.
A timeline from 1998 to 2026. Above, twenty-two
      roles as bars. Below, seven recurring threads, each appearing briefly, then
      a long red span marking its absence, then returning.

What this cannot tell you

Whether the threads are real or retrofitted
They were assigned looking backwards. A thread named in 2026 and traced to 1998 is a pattern someone decided was there. The dates are checkable; the categories are a reading.
Why the gaps happened
An absence could be a problem going out of fashion, or a career moving away from it, or the same work continuing under a name nobody wrote down. The chart measures silence, not cause.
Two entries carry no year
Blade Ventures and Anmahian Winton Architects are in the data and not in the drawing, because an undated bar would have to be placed somewhere and any placement would be invented.